To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body

REVISED - September 27, 2006

REVISED - September 27, 2006

PLANNING DEPARTMENT

CITY AND COUNTY OF

SAN FRANCISCO

REVISED

Notice of Hearing on Application

For Zoning Variance

CITY HALL - Room 408

1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Session Begins at 9:30 P.M.

Public Hearing

Lawrence Badiner, Zoning Administrator

Marge Gambelin, Recording Secretary

Notice is hereby given to the general public and to owners of the subject property and other property within 300 feet that an application for variance under the Planning Code as described below has been filed with the Zoning Administrator.

Any remaining questions concerning this application review process may be answered by the Planning Information Center at (415) 558-6377.

Variance Calendars are available on the Internet at http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/planning/variance.htm.


Accessible Meeting Policy

Hearings are held at City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 408, Fourth Floor, San Francisco, CA. The closest accessible BART Station is the Civic Center Station located at the intersection of Market, Hyde and Grove Streets. Accessible curb side parking has been designated at points along McAllister Street. Accessible MUNI Lines serving City Hall are the 42 Downtown Loop, 9 San Bruno and 71 Haight/Noriega and the F Line. Accessible MUNI Metro Lines are the J, K, L, M, and N. For more information regarding MUNI accessible services, call (415) 923-6142. American sign language interpreters and/or a sound enhancement system will be available upon request by contacting Lulu Hwang at (415) 558-6318 at least 72 hours prior to a hearing. Individuals with severe allergies, environmental illnesses, multiple chemical sensitivity or related disabilities should call our accessibility hotline at (415) 554-8925 to discuss meeting accessibility. In order to assist the City's efforts to accommodate such people, attendees at public meetings are reminded that other attendees may be sensitive to various chemical based products. Please help the City to accommodate these individuals.

Cell Phone and/or Sound-Producing Electronic Devices Usage at Hearings

Effective January 21, 2001, the Board of Supervisors amended the Sunshine Ordinance by adding the following provision: The ringing of and use of cell phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices are prohibited at this meeting. Please be advised that the Chair may order the removal from the meeting room of any person(s) responsible for the ringing or use of a cell phone, pager, or other similar sound-producing electronic devices.

Know Your Rights Under the Sunshine Ordinance

Government's duty is to serve the public, reaching its decisions in full view of the public. Commissions, boards, councils and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people's business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people's review.

For more information on your rights under the Sunshine ordinance (Chapter 67 of the San Francisco Administrative Code) or to report a violation of the ordinance, contact Donna Hall, Administrator, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 409, by phone at (415) 554-7724, by fax at (415) 554-7854 or by E-mail at Donna_Hall@ci.sf.ca.us.

Attention:Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance [SF Admin.. Code 16.520 - 16.534] to register and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the Ethics Commission at 1390 Market Street #701, San Francisco, CA 94102, telephone (415) 554-9510, fax (415) 703-0121 and web site http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/ethics/.


ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

REVISED NOTICE OF HEARING ON

APPLICATION FOR ZONING VARIANCE

Notice is hereby given to the general public and to owners of the subject property and other property within 300 feet that an application for variance under the Planning Code as described below has been filed with the Zoning Administrator and will be considered at a PUBLIC HEARING to be held on Wednesday, September 27, 2006, City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 408 as follows:

9:30 A.M.

A. CONSENT CALENDAR

All items listed hereunder constitute a Consent Calendar and are considered to be routine by the Zoning Administrator. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the public so requests, in which case the matter shall be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered as a separate item at this time or at a future hearing.

(SHARON YOUNG)

1. 2006.0746V: 1541 FILBERT STREET, south side between Franklin Street and Van Ness Avenue, Lot 022 in Assessor's Block 0527 in an RM-2 (Residential, Mixed Districts, Moderate Density) Zoning District and a 40 X Height and Bulk District.

REAR YARD AND NONCOMPLYING STRUCTURE VARIANCES SOUGHT: The proposal is to construct a new roof deck at the rear of a three-story over garage, six-family dwelling. The proposed roof deck (approximately 17 feet wide by 27 deep by 4.5 feet high) will be accessed by an existing staircase within the center of the roof. A required second means of egress will be provided by extending an existing fire escape to the roof level at the rear of the building. The proposed expansion of the existing fire escape is located within the required rear yard.

Section 134 of the Planning Code requires a rear yard area in an RM-2 Zoning District to be equivalent to 45 percent of the total lot depth, or when using averaging, no less than 25 percent of the lot depth or 15 feet, whichever is greater. The subject property has a lot depth of 137.5 feet. Using averaging, the required rear yard of the subject property is approximately 57 feet. The proposed expansion of the fire escape to access the new roof deck will extend approximately 3.5 feet into the required rear yard.

Section 188 of the Planning Code prohibits the expansion or replacement of a noncomplying structure. Because the existing building already encroaches into the required rear yard, it is considered a legal noncomplying structure. Therefore, the proposed expansion of the fire escape at the rear of the building would be contrary to Section 188 of the Planning Code.

(ELAINE TOPE)

2. 2006.0953V: 51 CARMEL STREET, south side between Twin Peaks Boulevard and Cole Street. Lot 010 in Assessor's Block 1293, in an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family), District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.

REAR YARD AND NON-COMPLYING STRUCTURE VARIANCES SOUGHT: The proposal is to construct an approximately 25 foot wide by 11 foot deep roof deck over the rear of the existing first story of the two-story-over-garage building which contains two dwelling units. Open stairs are proposed to connect the new roof deck to the rear yard.

Section 134 of the Planning Code requires that the rear yard in an RH-2 District shall be 45 percent of the lot depth.

Using the 45% method, the required rear yard depth for the 131-foot deep subject lot, is approximately 59 feet. The existing building is legally non-complying, since it extends to within approximately 54 feet of the rear property line, encroaching into the required rear yard by five feet. Although the deck may be constructed upon the roof of the non-complying structure without the need for a variance, the proposed rear stairs, which would encroach approximately 26 feet into the rear yard, would require a rear yard variance.

Section 188 of the Planning Code prohibits the expansion, intensification or change in use of a non-complying structure. The existing 68-foot deep subject building encroaches five feet into the required rear yard. Therefore the subject building is considered a legal non-complying structure. The expansion of the non-complying structure through the addition of the exterior stairs would be contrary to Section 188.


(RICK CRAWFORD)

3. 2006.0940V: 2194-98 15th STREET, at the northeast corner of 15th and Noe Streets, Assessor's Block 3541 Lot 027; in a RM-1, (Residential, Mixed, Low Density) District, and within the 40-X Height and Bulk District.

REAR YARD AND EXPANSION OF NONCOMPLYING STRUCTURE VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to remove and replace existing exterior stairs in the middle of the building. The replacement stairs will be slightly larger than the existing stairs and include small decks, but will be reconstructed in the same location. The existing building covers the entire 105-foot deep lot and the stairs are located in the middle of the building.

Planning Code Section 134 requires a rear yard of 47 feet 3 inches, where none is proposed.

Planning Code Section 188 prohibits the expansion of a noncomplying structure that increases the structures degree of noncompliance.

(ERIKA S. JACKSON)

4. 2006.0837V: 30 COLERIDGE STREET, northwest side, between Powers and Fair Avenues; Lot 025 in Assessor's Block 5609; in a RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District, and in the Bernal Heights Special Use District.

REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to demolish and rebuild in kind the existing 14-foot by 10-foot rear yard deck and adjoining staircase. The deck extends from the rear building wall to the rear property line and is on the third floor. The Building Code also requires the construction of a one hour firewall from the foundation to the top of the guard rail along the rear property line and northeast side property line.

Planning Code Section 242(e)(B) establishes a rear yard requirement of 45 percent of lot depth in the RH-2 District. The required rear yard is 22'-6 . The existing legal non conforming residence is setback 10 feet from the rear building wall, and the existing deck, (which was constructed in the early 1970's without benefit of a permit) extends to the rear property line.


(TIM FRYE)

5. 2006.0838V 1350 STEVENSON STREET, Lot 037A in Assessor's Block 3513, between McCoppin Street and Duboce Avenue in an RM-1 (Low Density Residential, Mixed) District, and a 105-E Height and Bulk District.

REAR YARD AND OPEN SPACE VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to reconstruct in the same footprint and at the same height the rear 12' of the existing building to include additional dining space for each of the six dwelling units and a second means of egress. The addition will be approximately 25' in width and 36' in height to match the exterior walls and roof of the existing structure.

Planning Code Section 134(c) requires a minimum rear yard depth to be equal to 45 percent of the lot depth. The rear yard may be reduced based on the average depth of adjacent buildings. The existing structure on the lot extends approximately 59', to within 21'-6 of the rear lot line. The rear yard requirement is 36'. The project would leave a rear yard of approximately 9'. A building permit has already been issued to demolish the portion of the structure to be rebuilt.

Planning Code Section 134(c)(1) also restricts the last ten feet of buildable depth from being taller than 30-feet. The proposed addition at the third floor would be approximately 36' in height for a portion that would measure approximately 12' in depth by 25' in width.

Planning Code Section 135 requires usable open space be provided for each dwelling structure within the  R Districts composed of an outdoor area designed for outdoor living, recreation or landscaping. The rear yard is approximately 630 square feet and will be reduced to 270 square feet with the inclusion of the proposed addition. Neither meets the minimum dimension requirements to be credited as usable open space. The common open space requirement for this property is approximately 800 square feet.

B. REGULAR CALENDAR

(SOPHIE MIDDLEBROOK)

6. 2006.0807V: 4695-97 18th STREET (AKA 105 Danvers Street), on the southwest corner of 18th Street at Danvers Street; Lot 016A in Assessor's Block 2690 in an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.

REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to construct a storage shed at the rear of a corner, pie-shaped lot, and to allow screened, off-street parking within the required rear yard. The proposal would leave an open space in the center of the lot measuring 25' along Danvers Street, and would include removing the existing ground level deck at the rear of the subject property. The proposed storage shed would measure 8' along Danvers Street at the rear of the lot, would measure 8' in height, and would be screened by an approximate 12' perimeter wall along the length of Danvers Street. The existing wall along Danvers Street measures 9' in height.

Section 134 of the Planning Code requires that the subject property maintain a 22' long rear yard, equal to 25% of the length of the lot which measures only 88' in length.

Section 136(c)(19) of the Planning Code considers fences and windscreens no more than 10' above grade as permitted obstructions. The proposed wall along the length of the rear yard is approximately 12'.

(SOPHIE MIDDLEBROOK)

7. 2006.0914V: 737 CASTRO STREET, east side, between Liberty and 20th Streets; Lot 068 in Assessor's Block 3603 in an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.

REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to legalize a recently rebuilt sunroom. The original sunroom was located at the rear of the existing building at the second story, and was considered a non-complying structure that encroached into the required rear yard. The newly constructed sunroom is two stories, set in 2' from the lot's southern property line. Therefore, the new structure does not comply with the dimensions for a permitted obstruction under Planning Code Section 136 thereby encroaching into the required rear yard.

Section 134 of the Planning Code requires that the subject property maintain a 44'-6 rear yard. The existing setback between the rebuilt, two story sunroom and the rear property line is approximately 31'-9 . The sunroom, as built, extends 12'-6 into the required rear yard.

Section 188 of the Planning Code allows a non-complying structure to be rebuilt, providing that there is no new or increased discrepancy between existing conditions on the lot and the required standards of the Planning Code.

(TOM WANG)

8. 2006.0817V: 731 NOE STREET, east side between 20th and Liberty Streets; Lot 054 in Assessor's Block 3604 in an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.

FRONT SETBACK AND REAR YARD VARIANCES SOUGHT: The proposal is to construct an addition to the front of the existing two-story single-family dwelling. The proposed addition would be four-story tall in a terraced form. It would contain two garages on the ground floor accessible from Noe Street; a second dwelling unit occupying the first and second floors; and an expansion of the current dwelling unit onto the third floor.

Section 132(a) of the Planning Code requires a front setback of 15 feet, measured from the front property line, for the subject lot. Although the proposed ground floor garages would be considered as permitted obstructions in the required 15-foot front setback pursuant to Section 136(c)(27) of the Planning Code, the three upper floors of the addition would be within 6 feet of the front property line, encroaching 9 feet into the required front setback.

Section 134 (c)(4)(B) of the Planning Code requires a minimum rear yard that is equal to 25 percent of the total lot depth, or 26 feet 3 inches measured from the rear property line, for the subject lot. Because the existing rear yard on the lot does not meet the minimum rear yard requirement, an alternate minimum rear yard of 26 feet 3 inches must be provided somewhere at the currently undeveloped front portion of the lot. The proposed addition would provide no alternate minimum rear yard on the lot.

(KATE CONNER)

9. 2006.0340V: 422 VALLEY STREET, north side between Castro Street and Noe Street; Lot 011 in Assessor's Block 6612 in an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) District and in a 40-X Height and Bulk District.

REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to allow construction of vertical and horizontal rear additions to the existing house. The proposal includes changes to the façade, a two story vertical addition, and a 24-foot deep horizontal addition to the rear of the subject house. The rear horizontal addition requires the variance. The existing non-complying shed at the rear property line is to be removed.

Section 134 of the Planning Code requires a minimum rear yard of approximately 48 feet and the proposed addition encroaches ten feet into the rear yard, thereby providing a 38-foot rear yard.

(CECILIA JAROSLAWSKY)

10. 2006.0739V: 405 FAIR OAKS STREET, east side, between 25th and 26th Streets; Lot 37 in Assessor's Block 6533 in an RH-3 (House, Three-Family) and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.

REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to demolish and reconstruct four-story decks and stairs within the permitted rear yard of a three-family dwelling. The existing decks and stairs are approximately 17 feet wide by seven feet deep, approximately one foot from the north property line and nine feet from the south property line. The proposed decks would be approximately 17 feet wide by 16 feet deep, five feet from the north property line and nine feet from the south property line, and would encroach approximately nine feet into the required rear yard. The project also includes a deck, 30 inches above grade and approximately 13 feet wide by 16 feet deep, that does not require or is part of this Variance.

Section 134 of the Planning Code requires a minimum rear yard of 45 feet, where 24 has been proposed; therefore, the construction of the rear decks would be contrary to Section 134 and would require a Variance.

(CECILIA JAROSLAWSKY)

11. 2006.0853V: 2569 SAN JOSE AVENUE, south side between Foote and Ottawa Avenues; Lot 25 in Assessor's Block 7046 in an RH-2 (House, Two-Family) and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.

REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to construct a new, two-family, three-level structure on a vacant triangular lot. The subject property abuts state property, currently open space, to the south. The structure would encroach approximately 28 feet into the required 37-foot rear yard.

Section 134 of the Planning Code requires a minimum rear yard of 45 feet, where 17 feet has been proposed; therefore, the construction of the structure would be contrary to Section 134 and would require a Variance.

(CECILIA JAROSLAWSKY)

12. 2006.0842V: 525 ULLOA STREET, south side between Kensington Way and Granville Way; Lot 23 in Assessor's Block 2988 in an RH-1(D) (House, One-Family (Detached Dwellings) and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.

REAR YARD AND SIDE YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to add a new one-car garage within the rear yard and side yard of a lot containing a two-story, single-family structure. The garage would be approximately 15 feet wide by approximately 20 feet deep.

Section 133 of the Planning Code requires a minimum side yard of 3 feet, where 0 feet has been proposed; therefore, the addition of the garage would be contrary to Section 133 and would require a Variance.

Section 134 of the Planning Code requires a minimum rear yard of 26 feet, where 0 feet has been proposed; therefore, the addition of the garage would be contrary to Section 134 and would require a Variance.

(DAN DIBARTOLO)

13. 2004.0653V: 1151 SUTTER STREET, through lot on the south side of Sutter Street and on the north side of Hemlock Street between Polk and Larkin Streets; Lot 014 in Assessor's Block 0692, in the Polk Street Neighborhood Commercial (NCD) District and a 65-A Height and Bulk District.

REAR YARD WAIVER SOUGHT: The proposal is to demolish the existing two story commercial structure and to construct a new five story mixed-use structure that would contain a ground level commercial space at the Sutter Street frontage with eight residential units at the upper floor levels. The project includes eight off-street parking spaces, utilizing a mechanical stacker system, accessed via a new garage entry with a new 10' wide curb cut at the Hemlock Street frontage. The project does not propose to provide the required 25% rear yard at the residential levels and would provide a roof deck to meet usable open space requirements for the residential units. Therefore, the Zoning Administrator at a public hearing will consider a request for waiver of rear yard requirements.

Section 134 (a) of the Planning Code requires a minimum rear yard depth of 25% at the lowest story containing a dwelling unit and in no case less than 15 feet for the subject property, measured from the rear property line. The subject property has a rear yard requirement of approximately 30 feet. The project does not propose to provide the required 25% rear yard at the residential levels and would provide a roof deck to meet usable open space requirements for the residential units.

(ERIKA S. JACKSON)

14. 2006.0960V: 19 WINFIELD STREET, southeast side, between Coso and Esmeralda Avenues; Lot 054 in Assessor's Block 5612; in an RH-1 (Residential, House, Single-Family) District, a 40-X Height and Bulk District, and in the Bernal Heights Special Use District.

MASS REDUCTION VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to add 238 square feet to the first floor, and 259 square feet to the second floor increasing the total square footage of the single-family residence from 1,273 to 1,770. The proposal also includes an addition to the existing garage, moving the front facade of the garage to the front property line and in line with the garages on the adjacent properties.

Planning Code Section 242(e)(3) requires a 650 square foot reduction from the maximum permissible building height and lot coverage on lots less than 100 feet in depth. Due to the 70 foot lot depth, and the legal non-conforming rear building extension into the required rear yard setback, no mass reduction is provided.

(MAT SNYDER)

15. 2006.1007V: 17 ELSIE STREET, Lot 054 in Assessor's Block 5613, east side between Coso Avenue and Esmeralda Avenue, in an RH-1 (House, One-family) District, the Bernal Heights Special Use District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.

PARKING VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to legalize the lack of parking for the subject site. When the house at 19 Elsie Street was constructed in 1990, it replaced a previously existing garage that was owned by the same owner of 17 Elsie Street. The new structure at 19 Elsie Street was required to provide an additional parking space to serve 17 Elsie Street. This variance request is to relinquish this requirement.

Planning Code Section 150(d) prohibits any parking space that wholly or partially meets a parking requirement from being eliminated. The Zoning Administrator had placed a condition of approval on the construction of 19 Elsie Street that it contain an additional parking space to replace the previously existing garage that had served 17 Elsie Street. However, the house at 19 Elsie Street was constructed with room for only one parking space.

(MAT SNYDER)

16. 2006.0957V: 331 RUTLEDGE STREET, Lot 020 in Assessor's Block 5541, southeast corner of Rutledge and Alabama Streets, in a RH-2 (House, Two-family) District, the Bernal Heights Special Use District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.

REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to construct a single-family house at the front (corner) portion of a corner lot with its frontage along Alabama Street where an existing single-family house stands at the rear of the lot with its frontage along Rutledge. The proposal would include providing a 20-foot center open space between the existing house and the proposed new house in-lieu of a rear yard. However, an existing deck from the existing house, and a proposed balcony off of the proposed house would extend into the open space.

Planning Code Section 242(e)(2)(B) requires a 45-percent rear yard opposite the property's frontage. Where a dwelling structure exists at the rear of the lot, any further construction on the site is required to provide an open space equal to 25-percent of the lot depth pursuant to Zoning Administrator interpretation. This open space is to be free of obstructing structures such as decks and balconies. While the proposal would include a 25-percent open space between the existing and new dwelling units, an existing deck and a new balcony would extend into the open space.

(KIMBERLY DURANDET)

17. 2005.0274V: 427-431 14TH STREET, south side between Valencia and Guerrero Streets; Lot 029 in Assessor's Block 3546, in an RM-1 (Residential, Mixed, Low Density) District with a 50-X Height and Bulk Designation.

EXPOSURE VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to add a new roof deck on the front building with a second means of egress stairway in the rear of the building on this property. It also proposes to add two decks that extend approximately seven (7) feet from the rear building wall of the front building.

Planning Code Section 140 requires that all dwelling units in all use districts face an open area. This lot has two buildings with a separation between them that qualifies as the exposure requirement for the rear dwelling unit. The proposed decks and rear stairs extend into this open space, diminishing the rear dwelling unit exposure requirement.

(EDGAR OROPEZA)

18. 2006.0695V: 60 TEDDY AVENUE, Lot 070 in Assessor's Block 6204, a lot on the north side of Teddy Avenue between Alpha Street and Somerset Avenue in an RH-1 (House, One-Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.

LOT AREA VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to subdivide an existing 3,250 square foot lot into two separate lots of 1,625 square feet. The proposed lots would be 25 feet wide by 65 feet deep and would be improved with a new single-family residence on each lot.

Planning Code Section 121(e)(2) requires that properties in the RH-1 Zoning District contain no less than 2,500 square feet of lot area. The project proposes to subdivide an existing 3,250 square foot lot into two separate lots of 1,625 square feet each.

(JON PURVIS)

19. 2005.0481V: 2826-2838 JENNINGS STREET - west side at Fitzgerald Avenue, Lot 002 in Assessor's Block 4912 – within an RM-1 (Residential, Mixed, Low Density) Use District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.

OFF-STREET PARKING VARIANCES SOUGHT: The proposal is to convert approximately 1,200 gross sq ft of ground floor commercial space to a two-bedroom dwelling unit without a Code-complying off-street parking space.

Section 151 of the Planning Code requires one off-street parking space for every new dwelling unit. There is no off-street parking on the site now and none would be provided for the proposed unit.

C. CONTINUED ITEM

This item was previously scheduled for hearing on August 23, 2006. Since that time the project has been revised and will be heard today.

20. 2006.0620V: 280 GRANVILLE WAY, northeast corner of Claremont Boulevard; Lot 025 in Assessor's Block 2976 in an RH-1(D) (Residential, House, One-Family, Detached) Zoning District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.

REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to create a staircase from the first level of occupancy to a proposed roof deck above the existing attached garage. The scope of the previously proposed project has been reduced, and the current proposal does not enlarge the existing noncomplying garage or encroach into the required side yard.

Section 134 of the Planning Code requires a rear yard of 23-feet, 9-inches. The proposed staircase encroaches approximately 3-feet into the required rear yard, extending to within 11-feet, 6-inches of the rear property line.

Public Comment:

At this time, members of the public may address the Zoning Administrator on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Zoning Administrator except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Zoning Administrator will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. Each member of the public may address the Zoning Administrator for up to three minutes.

The Zoning Administrator will not take action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, including those items raised at public comment. In response to public comment, the Zoning Administrator may:

  1. respond to statements made or questions posed by members of the public; or
  2. request staff to report back on a matter at a subsequent meeting; or
  3. direct staff to place the item on a future agenda. (Government Code Section 54954.2(a))

Adjournment

Last updated: 11/17/2009 10:00:43 PM